Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Friday, January 16, 2009

A Good President & A Great Man

Last night President Bush said his final goodbye to the nation he has served for the past eight years. In the speech, he remained strong and steady, continuing to warn against the evils of terrorism and promote his belief that, if given the choice, all people will choose freedom. He defended his media-tarnished record, admiting some wrong decisions but reminding us that he was willing to make the tough decisions. Ever the optimist, President Bush used words of hope when speaking of the future of our country and our new president. He said,

"President Thomas Jefferson once wrote, 'I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.' As I leave the house he occupied two centuries ago, I share that optimism. America is a young country, full of vitality, constantly growing and renewing itself. And even in the toughest times, we lift our eyes to the broad horizon ahead."

I haven't agreed with every decision of the Bush administration. He got some things wrong. But as he leaves office, if I had the chance to tell him one thing, it would be "Thank you."

Thank you, Mr. President for holding your office with honor and dignity. Thank you for the tears that always come to your eyes as you speak of our troops and their families. Thank you for making the hard decisions. Thank you for your courage and steady leadership in the face of mounting pressure and criticism. Thank you for your commitment and your success in keeping my family safe for the past seven years. Thank you for using the most powerful office in the world to aid the most powerless people in the world -- the unborn.
_
Thank you for being a good president and a great man. May God bless you and may God bless our country.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Inmates for Obama

Meet the fine, upstanding citizens who helped President Obama win this historic election.


Hey... if you were in their shoes, you would've voted for change, too.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Congrats to Democrats...again

I'm neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet, but my election predictions came true last night. Click here for my comments about a McCain/Obama match-up.

History has given us a president unlike any we've ever had before. There are a lot of things going on in my mind about this.
1. The black community is experiencing their finest moment in our nation's history. It's a moment of vindication for them, a moment of deep emotion, a moment that is MLK's dream come true. It really was a powerful thing listening to Juan Williams, Colin Powell, and even Jesse Jackson fight back tears as they looked upon the first black president. For our black friends and neighbors, I am happy.
2. The political campaign waged by Mr. Obama was amazing... another history-making event. They were able to take a no-name (odd-name!) and sell it to the American people. By sticking to the vague, safe messages of "Change" and "Hope," liberals and moderates and probably even a few conservatives voted for their ideas of "change." Obama was the blank slate upon which each of his voters could project their "hopes."
Granted, they had no small bit of help from the economy and Bush's poll numbers, but still...
3. Barack Obama, my president, is still a political figure with whom I have deep disagreements. His views and record on abortion disgusts me and could never allow me to cast a vote for him. I pray that God changes his heart.
4. There's talk that the nation has shifted toward the left. I don't believe it for a minute. This was just the Democrats' year. How could it not be? The Republicans blew their time in power... they don't deserve it back right now. But the fact that California banned gay marriage is enough to show you that America is not moving left. So, my advice to the Republican party is don't jump to the middle of the aisle! Move back to the right... establish your convictions and stick with them.

We conservatives will be desperately looking for a voice in 2010, 2012. Until then, pray for Obama; pray for the Democratic House & Senate; and remember that Christ is our King and only His kingdom deserves our true allegiance.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

W. Stands for...


Something has happened. Something that so infuriated me that it roused me from my blogging hibernation.

Dianna & I went to see Oliver Stone's sorry excuse for a movie, "W." We were on a date and Hollywood just isn't producing much worth seeing these days, so we wound up in this movie. I can laugh at George Bush just as much as the next guy. These past 8 years have been a comedian's dream. But this movie... As I watched it, the 'W.' took on new meaning:

What??
Don't get me wrong, I expected an unflattering portrayal of Bush, but this was absurd.

Josh Brolin did well with the swagger and the speech, but beyond that, it stunk. Every demeaning thing they could throw in, they did. Bush is a sloppy eater who talks with his mouth full and picks his teeth with his finger. Bush talked to Laura while sitting (and wiping) on the toilet. Bush got a girl pregnant and made her abort the child (an allegation made by none other than the honorable Larry Flynt; it has never been substantiated). Bush's entire presidency, especially Iraq, was just an attempt to make daddy proud. What??

Condi Rice is a fawning servant... she might as well of called him 'massa' (Where's the claims of racism??). And don't even get me starter on Thandie Newton's sorry attempt at her accent.

Karl Rove is a loser who makes his way to power by brown-nosing Bush. Not to mention he looks like a mad scientist.

When is this going to end?
I actually said this out loud. Don't worry, it didn't seem to disturb the other 10 people in the theater. This was just a bad movie. Even if you loathe Bush, you had to be bored through most of this. It was like a cross between a boring documentary and one of those SNL skits that drags on with no laughs. There was no humor (I don't recall much laughter from anyone). There was no suspense, no action, no good acting... not even the slightest hint of entertainment! And I paid for it!!

Walked out
Yep. We left. We stayed for an hour and 1/2, but I just couldn't take it anymore. The kicker came when Bush visits wounded troops and just hands them a t-shirt and shows no compassion for them. Oliver Stone can say want he wants, the liberals can believe what they want, but I've seen this president in tears several times when just talking about those young men and women who fight to protect their rights to produce junk like this.

In the heat of a political season, I'm trying to stay off the blog for fear that I might say what I think of Obama and the socialist regime that might soon come to power. Suffice it to say, "NObama!"

Friday, July 25, 2008

NObama!

Gerard Baker of the London Times best sums up the Obama trip.
You've GOT to read this.
Warning: Not for the biblically illiterate.
_____
And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.

The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.

When he was twelve years old, they found him in the temple in the City of Chicago, arguing the finer points of community organisation with the Prophet Jeremiah and the Elders. And the Elders were astonished at what they heard and said among themselves: “Verily, who is this Child that he opens our hearts and minds to the audacity of hope?”

In the great Battles of Caucus and Primary he smote the conniving Hillary, wife of the deposed King Bill the Priapic and their barbarian hordes of Working Class Whites.
And so it was, in the fullness of time, before the harvest month of the appointed year, the Child ventured forth - for the first time - to bring the light unto all the world.

He travelled fleet of foot and light of camel, with a small retinue that consisted only of his loyal disciples from the tribe of the Media. He ventured first to the land of the Hindu Kush, where the
Taleban had harboured the viper of al-Qaeda in their bosom, raining terror on all the world.
And the Child spake and the tribes of Nato immediately loosed the Caveats that had previously bound them. And in the great battle that ensued the forces of the light were triumphant. For as long as the Child stood with his arms raised aloft, the enemy suffered great blows and the threat of terror was no more.

From there he went forth to Mesopotamia where he was received by the great ruler al-Maliki, and al-Maliki spake unto him and blessed his Sixteen Month Troop Withdrawal Plan even as the imperial warrior Petraeus tried to destroy it.

And lo, in Mesopotamia, a miracle occurred. Even though the Great Surge of Armour that the evil Bush had ordered had been a terrible mistake, a waste of vital military resources and doomed to end in disaster, the Child's very presence suddenly brought forth a great victory for the forces of the light.

And the Persians, who saw all this and were greatly fearful, longed to speak with the Child and saw that the Child was the bringer of peace. At the mention of his name they quickly laid aside their intrigues and beat their uranium swords into civil nuclear energy ploughshares.

From there the Child went up to the city of Jerusalem, and entered through the gate seated on an ass. The crowds of network anchors who had followed him from afar cheered “Hosanna” and waved great palm fronds and strewed them at his feet.

In Jerusalem and in surrounding Palestine, the Child spake to the Hebrews and the Arabs, as the Scripture had foretold. And in an instant, the lion lay down with the lamb, and the Israelites and Ishmaelites ended their long enmity and lived for ever after in peace.

As word spread throughout the land about the Child's wondrous works, peoples from all over flocked to hear him; Hittites and Abbasids; Obamacons and McCainiacs; Cameroonians and Blairites.

And they told of strange and wondrous things that greeted the news of the Child's journey. Around the world, global temperatures began to decline, and the ocean levels fell and the great warming was over.

The Great Prophet Algore of Nobel and Oscar, who many had believed was the anointed one, smiled and told his followers that the Child was the one generations had been waiting for.
And there were other wonderful signs. In the city of the Street at the Wall, spreads on interbank interest rates dropped like manna from Heaven and rates on credit default swaps fell to the ground as dead birds from the almond tree, and the people who had lived in foreclosure were able to borrow again.

Black gold gushed from the ground at prices well below $140 per barrel. In hospitals across the land the sick were cured even though they were uninsured. And all because the Child had pronounced it.

And this is the testimony of one who speaks the truth and bears witness to the truth so that you might believe. And he knows it is the truth for he saw it all on CNN and the BBC and in the pages of The New York Times.

Then the Child ventured forth from Israel and Palestine and stepped onto the shores of the Old Continent. In the land of Queen Angela of Merkel, vast multitudes gathered to hear his voice, and he preached to them at length.

But when he had finished speaking his disciples told him the crowd was hungry, for they had had nothing to eat all the hours they had waited for him.

And so the Child told his disciples to fetch some food but all they had was five loaves and a couple of frankfurters. So he took the bread and the frankfurters and blessed them and told his disciples to feed the multitudes. And when all had eaten their fill, the scraps filled twelve baskets.

Thence he travelled west to Mount Sarkozy. Even the beauteous Princess Carla of the tribe of the Bruni was struck by awe and she was great in love with the Child, but he was tempted not.
On the Seventh Day he walked across the Channel of the Angles to the ancient land of the hooligans. There he was welcomed with open arms by the once great prophet Blair and his successor, Gordon the Leper, and his successor, David the Golden One.

And suddenly, with the men appeared the archangel Gabriel and the whole host of the heavenly choir, ranks of cherubim and seraphim, all praising God and singing: “Yes, We Can.”

Monday, May 26, 2008

Get Behind Me, Pastors!

I can't believe I'm about to come to the defense of these guys, but here it goes...

John McCain has recently rejected the endorsement of two pastors, John Hagee & Rod Parsley due to some of their comments which are deemed 'politically incorrect.' The interesting part of this is that McCain actively sought the endorsement of both these men earlier this year when trying to convince evangelicals to back him. Yet, as soon as the media launched its attack on the pastors, McCain (seeing Obama's pastor trouble) dumped them. A few thoughts...

Their comments expressed common Evangelical beliefs. Let me be clear... I don't normally agree with Hagee & Parsley. In fact, I have numerous problems with both of their theologies, and I even consider some of Hagee's views heretical. However, the comments under question are in perfect keeping with a Protestant, Evangelical position.

Hagee harshly criticized and denounced the Catholic church. That's historically common among Protestants! If you think what he said was bad you should read Martin Luther or the English Puritans.
Hagee also said that Hitler was under God's sovereignty during the holocaust. That is absolutely true. God is sovereign over all things... even evil things. It may be hard to understand, but it is a fundamental Christian doctrine. And for the media to paint Hagee as anti-Semitic is just laughable. No pastor supports Israel & the Jews more than he. In fact, he founded CUFI, a political action committee solely devoted to supporting Israel.

Parsley criticized Islam as an 'anti-Christ' religion. Well, they certainly aren't pro-Christ, are they? To consider Islam (and all other religions) to be false is a biblically accurate statement and another fundamental Christian belief.

McCain (like most Republicans) uses Evangelicals. The DNC uses the black community and the RNC uses the evangelical community. In 2000, McCain called Jerry Falwell an 'agent of intolerance,' but in more recent years (leading up to election '08) he recanted and actually spoke at Liberty University. Now we see him begging for the endorsements of these pastors and just a few months later denouncing them as extremists. Thank God my hope doesn't rest in fickle politicians or in the ever-shifting sands of public policy!

Pastors & Politics don't mix. The Bible is a politically incorrect book. Jesus has some very unpopular commands. Thus, the pulpit and politics just don't jive... at least not these days. Our un-Christian nation doesn't understand a biblical worldview. And that's fine. This just gives us an opportunity to talk about biblical principles. But let's do it through conversation, not Congress. Let's win our neighbors' hearts by preaching, not PACs. Let's change our nation by our love, not our lobbying.

America needs to change. But Christians shouldn't look to Obama or McCain to get that job done. We need to look at ourselves, at our churches. We hold the tool to change America, for only we hold the Gospel.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Obama & Jesus

In an attempt to reach out to evangelical Christians and to dispel the (rather silly) internet rumors that he is a Muslim, Barack Obama has released a new flyer in Kentucky. On it, Obama is shown standing at a pulpit, with a glowing cross prominently displayed behind him. On the back, you can read a short version of Obama's conversion story: "That day Obama felt a beckoning of the spirit and accepted Jesus Christ into his life."

Really? Let's think this through...

Obama's church, Trinity United Church of Christ, is a bastion of black liberation theology, which preaches a false Gospel, one that replaces the biblical Christ with a black-power activist, spiritual salvation with political liberation, and God's people with black people. Thus, when Obama says that he is "doing the Lord's work" (quoted from the new flyer), one has to wonder what that really means. As the recent turmoils over Jeremiah Wright have disclosed, Trinity UCC is a false church with a false gospel. Yet it was in this false church, under the preaching of false doctrine that Obama claims to have had a (false?) salvation experience.

To top it all off, Trinity UCC is affiliated with the United Church of Christ, one of the most liberal denominations of our day. Their "God is still speaking" campaign reflects a common liberal view that God's Word, the Bible, is not the final authority. This allows room to interpret Scripture in light of modern scientific findings and popular cultural movements (i.e. the UCC's acceptance of homosexuality). To give you a taste of just how far-out this denomination is, here's an excerpt from a UCC website:

Although Christ is the primary lens through which we view God, we experience God
in a variety of ways. Through the centuries, one way the church talked about God
is through the Trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. We also speak about God in other ways that enrich our faith—God as mother, rock, liberator, savior, and friend.
Christ is a lens through which we view God? No; Christ is God! One way the church talked about God is through the Trinity? No; God is Triune! These aren't just ways to 'view' or 'experience' God. These are truths about the essential nature of God. And I won't even get started on the 'God as mother' stuff.

So Obama accepted Jesus into his life. I don't doubt that. The question is which Jesus? The black-empowering Jesus proclaimed from the pulpit of Jeremiah Wright? The all-inclusive, gay-friendly Jesus of the United Church of Christ? Some combination of these probably make up the Jesus that Obama accepted. That Jesus may empower you and make you feel good about yourself, but he cannot save you.

A Jesus who accepts all sinful lifestyles has nothing from which to save us. A Jesus who is not fully man and fully God could not conquer sin on the cross or defeat death at the Resurrection.

You, I & Obama need the biblical Jesus, the God-man who came to bear the wrath of God for us, who rose physically from the dead to grant us eternal life, and who will return again to judge all those who do not place their faith in Him today.

Which Jesus have you accepted?


____
PS- Sorry about the recent lack of activity on the blog!

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Congrats to Democrats

With Huckabee out, the official Republican nominee is an elderly white man who has zero charisma, speaks of a 100-year war in Iraq, and has yet to energize his own party's base. Now put this candidate up against a young, energetic black man whose speeches sound more like sermons and whose supporters seem more like disciples.
_
Get the point?

Sure, congratulations are in order for John McCain. But his nomination is ultimately a victory for Democrats... particularly, Barack Obama. If November's decision is between Obama & McCain, get used to saying, 'President Obama.' If it's Hillary (which I hope it is) Republicans have a shot. But with a war-weary electorate and a hurting economy, Republicans have a hard row to hoe. That's why the GOP candidate needed to be fresh and vibrant... two words never used to describe John McCain.

Don't get the wrong idea. Yeah, I supported Huckabee, but I'm not bitter about this. After Super Tuesday, I really didn't expect much more from Huck. I'll bite the bullet and vote for McCain. But the reality is that a Democrat will most likely take the White House in '08.

Huckabee in 2012??

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Don't Forget to Vote!

Today is the first-in-the-South primary, and citizens of South Carolina get to pick the next Republican candidate for president. Don't miss out on this opportunity to send the right man for the right time to the White House. I strongly believe that man is Gov. Mike Huckabee and I encourage everyone to get out and support him today.

He's a true conservative with the longest governing experience. He has consistently been on the right side of the abortion and gay marriage debates. He's strong on defense and strong on illegal immigration. His health care plan will work. And he's the only Republican running who understands the plight of the blue-collar, middle-class workers. We need this man to be the next leader of our nation.


MikeHuckabee.com - I Like Mike!

I'm voting for Mike Huckabee, and I hope you will too!

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Michigan Doesn't Matter

Looking at a map, it's hard to notice Michigan with all the Great Lakes around it. Well, with apologies to all the good folks who live up there, the political reality is that the Great Lake State's primaries really don't make a big difference. Iowa was huge. New Hampshire was huge. South Carolina will be huge. But tomorrow's headlines should read, "Romney won... big deal."

Here's why:

-Historically, a candidate must win 2 out of these 3: Iowa (the first caucus), New Hampshire (first in the nation primary), and South Carolina (first in the South primary). Regardless of how much Michigan tried, they can't change this reality.
-No one, except Romney, was even in Michigan for the results! When the candidates don't stick around to celebrate with you, you don't matter much.
-The Dems boycotted Michigan. They were all at a debate in Nevada. Thus, the media attention was split.

What lies ahead?

I predict this won't help Romney at all. From now until Saturday, all eyes are on South Carolina, and most South Carolinians are looking at either Huckabee or McCain. The South Carolina GOP is split and has been so for awhile. On one side you've got social conservatives who voted for Bush in 2000, Bob Peeler in 2002, and David Beasley in 2004. On the other side you've got fiscal conservatives who voted for McCain in 2000 and Mark Sanford and Lindsey Graham in 2002. Sanford has been less-than-spectacular to say the least, and Graham... don't get me started!

So the Huckabee/McCain showdown here is a mini Civil War of sorts! And just to add fuel to the fire, take a little refresher course on Ol' Man McCain's track record.

Keep your eyes on the Palmetto state because Saturday is sure to be exciting!

Friday, January 4, 2008

Iowa's Powerful Message: Change

Last night two men won big in Iowa: Mike Huckabee & Barack Obama. Huckabee drew thousands of evangelical Christians to the polls for the first time, reminding the Republican establishment, yet again, that without evangelical support, a Democrat will be the next president. And after being outspent nearly 15 to 1, he also showed that money can't buy the nomination. On the other side, Obama drew thousands of first time voters... many Independents and even some Republicans. He also proved that a black man can win in a state with a 93% white population.

These two men have left a tremendous mark on the political landscape. But behind the numbers there is a message. And that very clear message is that America wants change. The message of change has been the focus of both the Huckabee and Obama campaigns. In fact, as I listened to the winners' speeches last night, I found them both to be refreshing. These are the men who can take America into the future (and I personally prefer Huckabee's vision of the future over Obama's).

The big losers out of Iowa are Mitt Romney (who spent the most & came in a distant 2nd) and Hillary Clinton (who placed 3rd behind Edwards!). Again, the message from Iowa is change! Romney loves to defend the Bush White House, while Huckabee has been willing to look at things openly and objectively. Another big problem for Romney is the fact that he looks like he's a rich, snobby Republican. When blue-collar Democrats think Republican, they picture a guy like 'Mitt.'

Hillary, Hillary, Hillary. The lesson for her is that you can't talk about your 35 year-long career in politics with former President Clinton, former Sec. of State Albright, and former DNC chair Terry McAuliffe standing on stage and then expect people to believe you're an agent of change!! The Clinton machine is out of steam, and nobody wants to go back to the '90s.

Iowans spoke for all of us last night. We're all tired of the status-quo. We're all sick of the feuds in Washington. We're all ready for change.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Mormon on the Mount

Some are hailing Mitt Romney's speech as one of the grandest, noblest orations in the history of presidential politics. This is one for the history books, no doubt, but was it as noble and open as some would have us believe? I don't think so.

In the speech, Mr. Romney tried to convince conservative Christians (who make up a significant percentage of Republican voters) that his Mormon faith was normal, mainstream and very much like their own faith. With evangelicals in mind, he said,"What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind." John Green, director of the Pew Research Center's Forum on Religion & Public Life and a professor of political science at the University of Akron, called that "one of the boldest statements of faith that I can ever remember."

Or was it?

Far from being a bold statement of his true beliefs, Mr. Romney's response demonstrates the evangelical concern over Mormonism: they deceitfully word their beliefs in ways that appeal to Christians when, in fact, their beliefs are diametrically opposed to biblical Christianity.

Foreseeing this evangelical concern, Mr. Romney added, "My church's beliefs about Christ may not all be the same as those of other faiths. Each religion has it own unique doctrines and history. These are not bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance."

Let's get a few things clear here...
Mormon Belief: Jesus is the first 'son' of God. God's other 'sons' include the angels and all mankind.
Christian Belief: Jesus is the Father's "only begotten Son."

Mormon Belief: Jesus is not a member of the Trinity. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three separate Gods.
Christian Belief: There is one God in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. These three are the same in their nature and equal in power and glory.

Mormon Belief: God was once a human. He progressed to become God, and male (not female) humans may do the same. God is one of many gods.
Christian Belief: God has eternally existed as the One True God. Humans are His creation and can never become a deity.

Mormon Belief: Jesus visited the Native Americans after His resurrection and started the true church among them. (So I wonder why we never found any Mormon Indians... hmm)
Christian Belief: Jesus visited His disciples in Jerusalem after the resurrection then ascended into heaven only to return on the Last Day.

"Unique doctrines," indeed, Mr. Romney! Can I tolerate a man who believes such things? Certainly. But I cannot tolerate a man (and a religion) that attempts to trick people into thinking these wicked, cultish heresies are merely a "unique" expression of Christian thinking!

Romney's speech is sure to woo many conservatives... the kind who love to hear presidential candidates talk about keeping nativity scenes at courthouses and God in the pledge. But I hope, I pray that evangelical Christians (to whom this speech was directed) will see it for what it is:
An attempt to make a false church that exalts a false Christ
seem normal and good.

"Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world."
1 John 4:1

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Christians & '08 (Part III)

There are probably some politically savvy conservative folks who have read these posts and think I'm clueless. When it comes to politics, it's all about pragmatics for most people. Admittedly, as I sat down to write these posts, my outlook was one of pragmatics as well. But in thinking through these issues biblically, I have come to some different conclusions. My mindset has changed. Here's what I mean...


Primary Mentality vs. General Election Mentality

In the general election, our choices are limited. By this time next year, all of America will have sorted through the candidates, picking two we may or may not like. At that point, I think our mentality should be ‘Do What Most Honors God.’ Pick the candidate who you feel will do the best job at leading and making God-honoring decisions while in the White House.

But in the primaries, Christians tend to have a better choice of candidates. There is usually a candidate who is consistently conservative and has a decent character. This is certainly true for us this year. Thus, I think our mentality during the primaries should be ‘No Compromise.’ While we have the best option, I say we fight for the best option.
Right now, I’m in ‘Primary Mentality.’

At this point, you cannot convince me to vote for Romney, a Mormon whose history fails to prove his current conservative rhetoric. At this point, you cannot convince me to vote for Giuliani, a man as liberal as Hillary on social issues and as immoral as Bill on personal issues.

I don't care who can or cannot beat Hillary. And neither should you. Who's to say she'll even get the nomination? This time 4 years ago Howard Dean was the man to beat! It's not our job to predict the future. As Christians, it's our job to vote for the best man. And right now we've got some decent choices. Here are a few candidates that I submit for your consideration.
_
_
_
Click on their names to see their stands on the issues.
(And, yes, Huckabee tops the list purposefully!)

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Christians & '08 (Part II)

Before I share the last 2 biblical principles that guide us during an election season, I want to comment on some recent endorsements from Christian leaders. Don Wilton (Pastor of FBC Spartanburg), Bob Jones III (President of Bob Jones University), and Wayne Grudem (Bible professor & author) have all endorsed Mitt Romney. Today, we've learned that Pat Robertson has endorsed Rudy Guiliani... talk about a shocker!

Why are these conservative Christian leaders (and let it be known that I greatly respect Don Wilton & Wayne Grudem) supporting candidates so unlike themselves? One very simple reason... we are scared to death Hillary might win. That's the sole reason. "Who can beat Hillary?"... that's the only thing that matters to these leaders right now. And I can certainly understand. Electing Hillary Clinton could arguably be the worst political decision in American history. However, I think the fear of a second President Clinton is causing these Christian leaders to break the first 2 biblical principles.

It seems that Wilton, Jones, & Grudem are guilty of breaking Principle #2 (Allowing 'Electability' to trump what is most God-honoring). And it seems that Robertson, much to everyone's surprise, is breaking Principle #1 (Compromising on Righteousness). Robertson's mistake is much more dangerous than that of the other men. I think all conservative Christians who live in fear of another Clinton Administration would do well to remember these last 2 biblical principles.

PRINCIPLE #3 – Submit to the candidate who wins.
“Be submissive to rulers and authorities, be obedient, be ready for every good work.”
Titus 3:1

Whether your candidate wins or not, you must be willing to submit to the next leader of our country. There are a few candidates on both sides of the aisle who I adamantly oppose. If they are elected, I must be willing to respect them as our nation’s leader, regardless of how much I disagree with them. The only way this is possible is if I understand principle #4.
_
PRINCIPLE #4 – God is Sovereign over elections.
“There is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.”
Romans 13:1
_
The Sovereign Lord determines who will be president. We have to understand that whoever is elected is also the person God appointed… even though that person may not honor Him at all. For reasons higher than ours, God grants authority to whomever He chooses. If Hillary is elected, it is part of God's sovereign plan. This is certainly no reason to just sit back and let the chips fall where they may. We should work diligently supporting the candidate we believe to be most God-honoring and pray fervently for the Lord to bless our nation with a good leader.
_
But when the election night returns come in, we can rest in the fact that God's Wisdom and Providence are behind it all. Even the leader of the free world is just a servant to the Sovereign Lord.
_______
Some final thoughts tomorrow... along with a few recommendations (not endorsements!)

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Christians & '08

It’s the 1st Tuesday of November… Lord willing, this time next year, we’ll be choosing our 44th President of these United States. As Americans, we have a unique system of government. We’re a government of the people, by the people, for the people. The government is made up of the citizens. The government is chosen by the citizens. And the government is for the good & protection of the citizens.

This form of government (a Democratic Republic) was unthinkable in biblical times. Thus, Scripture does not give us a list of qualifications for public office. Should a Mormon be president? Scripture doesn’t say. Should Christians vote for a pro-choice candidate? Scripture doesn’t say.

This does not mean that God’s Word is useless and irrelevant for us when it comes to picking a president. Far from it! There are principles given to us in Scripture that apply to our situation.

PRINCIPLE #1 – We may compromise on policy, but not on righteousness.
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men.”
Romans 1:18
_
Lowering taxes, balancing the budget, education, etc. are all important issues. But they are not so important that we cannot compromise on them.

The protection of marriage, the right to life for the unborn, etc. are all sin issues. To support gay marriage would be a sin. To support the killing of babies would be a sin. We cannot compromise on issues like these. If such things invite the wrath of God upon our nation, it would be both foolish and wicked to compromise.

Thus, I cannot vote for Guiliani, McCain, or any of the Democratic candidates, regardless of how much I may like or approve of their leadership styles.

PRINCIPLE #2 – Vote to honor God, not to win the election.
“And whatever you do, in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.”
Col. 3:17

As followers of Christ, our litmus test cannot be ‘electability.’ Rather, our chief concern must be making sure that our vote honors God. The question for us as we enter the voting booth is, ‘How can I use my vote so that God would receive the most glory?’.

Understand that the vote that honors God the most in the primaries may not be the vote that honors God the most in the general elections. For example, I don’t think the most God-honoring vote at this point would be for Romney, who adheres to a false religion, a mainstream cult. However, in the general elections, if our options are Romney (Mormon) vs. Obama (Supporter of Gay Marriage/Abortion), the more God-honoring vote would be for Romney.

What if the two candidates in the general election both support abortion and gay marriage (i.e. Guiliani vs. Hillary)? What is the most God-honoring vote at this point? This is more difficult for me. It seems to me that we have two options under this scenario: 1) Choose the ‘lesser of two evils’ 2) Vote for a third party candidate.
__________
Lord willing, I'll give the Last 2 Principles tomorrow...

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Sharpton Goes A-Huntin'

Mark it down... if Dick Cheney goes hunting, something bad is bound to happen. Last time, he shot a hunting partner down in Texas. This time, he's got Al Sharpton up in arms.

The hunting club that Cheney visited in Upstate New York apparently had a small confederate flag hanging in a garage. Word of this got back to Al Sharpton who issued a statement saying, "the vice president should leave immediately, denounce the club and apologize for going to a club that represents lynching, hate and murder to black people."

Unbelievable. Sharpton is a pro at making racist mountains out of insignificant molehills. It was a small flag in an obscure location. But listening to Sharpton, you'd think Cheney made a campaign stop at the local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan. And while I certainly can understand how black people find the confederate flag offensive, I don't think it's fair to assume that everyone flying the flag wants to "lynch, hate and murder" black people. Sharpton, as always, was looking hard for a way to stir up racial tension.

Those of us who desire to see genuine racial unity have to realize that Sharpton is not on our team. I pray that the black community would recognize that his actions and comments do more harm than good when it comes to resolving racism in America.
_
Cheney was hunting ducks; Sharpton was hunting hate.

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Dancing with a Dictator

Columbia University, one of America’s premier educational institutions, is inviting Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to address their students. Ahmadinejad controls the nation of Iran and is an up and coming modern day Hitler. Columbia’s guest speaker has called the Holocaust a “myth” and constantly refers to America as the “great Satan.” Iran, under his leadership, has every intention of destroying both Israel and the United States. The Muslim nation defiantly seeks to develop its nuclear capabilities and is solely responsible for much of the insurgence in Iraq.

Columbia sure knows how to pick ‘em!

The university’s president claims that Ahmadinejad’s appearance is part of the school’s “long-standing tradition of serving as a major forum for robust debate.” Really? I wonder how the liberal student body would feel about George W. Bush paying a visit. I wonder if the school's administration would have allowed Jerry Falwell to join the ‘robust debate?'

I must say that I find Columbia’s invitation of Iran’s dictator to be the very definition of offensive. This is anti-American, anti-Semitic and completely lacks any concern for the families of 9/11 and our Armed Forces. This is a disgusting and shameful perversion of free speech and academic expression. It is nothing short of hate-speech sponsored by pathetically weak liberals whose tolerance level has grown so wide that they now kiss evil on the cheek and pat despots on the back.

Yet, this insanity is America’s definition of learning. We send our children off to sit under the teaching of Ahmadinejad and people who defend him. All the while, the terrorists sit back and mock these foolish Americans. Columbia took the bait. They fell for the publicity stunt. They have chosen to dance with this dictator… and it’s easy to see who has the lead.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Is Hillary Man Enough?


I’m quite interested in the current debate between the wife of John Edwards and the husband of Hillary Clinton. Elizabeth Edwards is attacking Hillary for not being strong enough on women’s rights. In her remarks, she suggested that Mrs. Clinton might be staying away from women’s issues in order to “behave as a man.”

Mr. Clinton, a.k.a. the 42nd president, defended his wife, saying that Hillary “isn’t trying to be a man.” “I defy you,” he continued, “to find anybody who has run for office in recent history whose got a longer history of working for women.”

Of course, this is all just a political play (a good one I might add). John Edwards needs women’s votes, so he’s sending his wife out to get them. Pretty simple. But this brings up a good question in relation to feminism.

Does feminism encourage women to embrace femininity or does it encourage women to become more masculine?

The goal of the feminist movement has been for women to “break the glass ceiling” of every male-dominated career path. I’d say they’ve done well at this mission, so well, in fact, that we have a serious female contender among the 2008 presidential candidates.

But how do the feminists achieve their goal? What are the means to their end? What will Hillary do to break through that final glass ceiling?

Act like a man.

Elizabeth Edwards is right. In order to get elected, Mrs. Clinton has to exert every ounce of testosterone in her body. For instance, when’s the last time you saw her wearing a dress (she’s the pantsuit princess!)? Have you noticed her hair getting shorter? Don’t you think her speeches seem unnaturally aggressive?

Do you see any common feminine qualities (gentle, compassionate, caring, etc.) in Hillary Clinton? No! She comes across as hard-lined, tough, and completely unfriendly. (Political Note: Bob Dole came across that way in ’96. It didn’t work.)

Feminism deceives women into believing that the way to find worth in the world is to be as masculine as possible. Even highly intelligent women, like Mrs. Clinton, have fallen prey to this awful lie. Modern women have been “liberated” only to find themselves behind the bars of guilt and confusion. God’s Word, our sole basis for truth, affirms femininity as valuable and honorable.

My prayer is that today’s women would know this truth, and that the truth would set them free from the oppressive chains of feminism!

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Torn Between Two Kingdoms: Learning from the Life of Jerry Falwell

Jerry Falwell. Just the name conjures up some sort of emotion in you, doesn't it? For me, the emotions are mixed. I respected the man as a strong defender of biblical morality. I once heard him preach in South Carolina on being salt and light in the culture. He genuinely believed that to be his mission, and I respect him for taking very difficult stands. Our nation needs more men who are principled and unashamed of the truth. His death is a great loss.

But there's another side of me that has always been uneasy with Jerry Falwell, not him as a person, but him as an "icon." That's exactly what he was. He was one of those larger-than-life figures who accomplished much in his 73 years. But much of what he accomplished was temporal... earthly... political.

Jerry Falwell was torn between two kingdoms: that which is Caesar's and that which is God's (Matthew 22:21). At first, he wasn't very interested in politics, but after the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, he felt like he needed to do something. That's understandable. But did he get too involved? I believe so.

I say this, not to criticize this good man, but to exhort and rebuke today's Christian citizens. This message is especially needed as the '08 elections kick off. We fall prey to the mentality that politics is the answer. Our hope rises and falls with whoever is in the White House. Brothers and sisters, whether our next leader is Hillary, Rudy, Obama, or McCain, God is still sovereignly carrying out His good purposes. The Lord Jesus Christ is still working all things for His glory.
Jerry Falwell spent much time, energy, and money in making sure that moral leaders were elected. But even Ronald Reagan, for all his virtues, still had many vices. George W. Bush, the conservative Christian's choice, is still far from ideal. Learn from what I believe to be Jerry Falwell's mistake: Our hope does not sit behind the desk in the oval office! Our hope sits in the Heavens, at the right hand of the Father!
_
But allow me to end this with a little exhortation. Jerry Falwell was like any of us, a sinner saved by God's glorious grace. He made mistakes. Let's learn from them. Yet, he also set an example, a good one: He did something. Don't just sit back and allow Satan to wreck havoc on your community, do something! Don't just accept that your children must learn unbiblical agendas, do something! Don't just ignorantly follow the culture's message, do something! True faith will produce works. Biblical faith is active. What are you doing? Following the example of Jerry Falwell, share your faith, teach your kids, speak the truth, reject immorality. But don't lose sight of your true hope.

Jerry Falwell has entered into a heavenly inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading (1 Peter 1:4). That is where our hope lies.

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Gays Welcome

The former Governor of New Jersey, James McGreevey, has been in the news a lot recently. You'll recall that he resigned his political position after admitting having an affair with a male staffer. He announced that he was a "gay American" in August of 2004, becoming what many have dubbed the first openly gay Governor... a title that I don't understand because he resigned as soon as he announced his sexuality. His messy divorce from Dina Matos McGreevey has been the most recent news involving the Ex-Governor.

Today, the news tells us that Mr. McGreevey - a lifelong Catholic - has joined the Episcopal church. Not only has he joined... he's planning on attending their seminary in the Fall! Naturally, this raises a lot of issues, but my initial thoughts aren't about sexuality and the priesthood or the gay rights movement. I'm thinking about the Episcopal church's acceptance of McGreevey into communion... and possibly into leadership.

James McGreevey is a homosexual. He is an adulterer. He is going through a divorce. His wife claims that he is showing perverse art to his 5 year old daughter. This man now wants to join the Episcopal church... and they say, "Welcome!" with arms wide open. Episcopals open their arms to gays, adulterers, and divorcees.

And so do I.

Christ's invitation stands for the homosexual. Jesus' call to follow Him stands for the adulterer. The cross stands to forgive any sinner, including me.

But there is a difference between what I'm saying and what the Episcopals are saying. There is a difference between biblical Christianity and liberal Christianity. Liberal Christianity welcomes the sinner, never asking for change. Biblical Christianity welcomes the sinner, urging and demanding change. The key difference is summed up in one word: repentance. Repentance is a sinner turning from sin to Christ... when a sinner begins to hate his sin and begins to love Jesus Christ... when the sinful habits that we treasure become disgusting to us in light of the invaluable blessings of following Christ. Repentance! Without it, there is no faith. Apart from repentance, we become like the Pharisees and hypocrites, of whom Jesus said, "You clean the outside of the cup and the plate, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence." Jesus' description fits liberal Christianity in many ways. They have the outward forms of religion, the external marks of Christendom, but inside, nothing has changed.

Mr. McGreevey can join the church, go through seminary, and become a priest, but he's still filthy on the inside. Pray for him. And realize that it can happen to you and me, as well. We can devote our lives to going to church, walking aisles, praying prayers, etc. and still have our hearts filled with the nastiness of sin.

I leave you with the chilling, yet gloriously "welcoming" words of Jesus:

"Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."